tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7907242376932529587.post8649683975900548923..comments2023-10-21T05:02:24.857-07:00Comments on The Wizards Of Reasonism: The Ethics of False Attributions: A Reply to Massimo PigliucciPurple Wizardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02469323604370170246noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7907242376932529587.post-27218399466291919592010-12-03T14:10:33.431-08:002010-12-03T14:10:33.431-08:00People may want to hear the other side of this by ...People may want to hear the other side of this by scrolling through the comments during the original discussion:<br /><br />http://goo.gl/qcWn6Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09099460671669064269noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7907242376932529587.post-75585843282073235692010-12-01T18:07:16.191-08:002010-12-01T18:07:16.191-08:00Here's a stunning example of Richard Dawkins s...Here's a stunning example of Richard Dawkins saying something so obviously out of tune with attribution the notion of religion being the "root of all evil" that it strikes me as painfully obvious, yet again, that Massimo is straightforwardly wrong on this issue:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NSk_ZeAH_I&feature=related<br /><br />In particular, it strikes me as quite obviously false for Pigliucci to claim that Dawkins "cavalierly dismisses" the social good of religion given what he says at 2:03 and onward, where Dawkins explicitly DOES credit to religion good acts.Black Wizardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08949348499784878738noreply@blogger.com